Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:15
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia bombards Ukraine with 479 drones overnight, Ukrainian air force says - ABC News
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supreme Court Hands Trump ‘GIANT WIN’ in Birthright Citizenship Case - Rolling Stone
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What song are you listening to right now? What does it mean to you?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
In what ways is Bollywood becoming westernized?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.